|
If the hallmark of the Nazi regime was the totalitarian oppression of an entire population through the use
of propaganda and dictatorial tactics in politics, then there are some striking parallels to the Nazi mentality and the mentality
of the new-liberals in today’s America. Here are just a few of those parallels offered for the reader’s
consideration.
ITEM ONE: It has been recently disclosed that the predominantly young and liberal staff of
a good many Borders Books stores have bragged in chat rooms on the internet that they have engaged in a concerted effort to
prevent their customers from having access to the book entitled "Unfit For Command." This best-selling book was written
primarily by John O’Neill [with Jerome Corsi], a Vietnam veteran who had served with John Kerry in Vietnam and
who, along with dozens of other veterans who knew Kerry, wanted to speak the truth about Kerry’s supposedly heroic war
record. Specifically, these employees at Borders Books had engaged in the deliberate mishandling and damaging of copies of
the book so that they would have to be returned to the publisher unsold and had also deliberately taken whole shipments of
the book and stacked them away in far corners of their storage rooms so that they would never make it to the bookshelves.
When customers asked about finding copies of the book they were treated derisively by the staff at Borders and frequently
urged to buy and read copies of Michael Moore’s books instead.
Now bear in mind that one of Michael Moore’s main liberal rants in his own book entitled "Dude, Where’s
My Country?" relates to the paranoid belief that Attorney General John Ashcroft and the FBI are going to raid public libraries
across America in order to find out what we citizens are reading and then somehow control our reading habits. Liberals
think this is a terrible abridgement of our First Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. But they see no hypocrisy
in attempting to control the reading habits of others by physically preventing public access to a book that they disagree
with, or--more to the point--do not want to have widely read because it exposes as a liar the man who is running against a
president who they dislike, George W. Bush. These young de facto Nazis who are hiding books from the public are just one step
away from doing what their philosophical antecedents had engaged in during the Third Reich---book burning.
ITEM TWO: Although George W. Bush has signed Form 180 authorizing the release for public
disclosure all of his military records from the Vietnam era, liberal media reporters have not only persisted in pouring over
35-year-old National Guard pay stubs in an effort to "prove" that he was AWOL in the Alabama Air National Guard, but recently
Dan Rather used forged documents in an effort to "prove" the same thing. Although it turned out that these documents had been
generated on a MicroSoft Word software program which did not even exist during the purported dates found on the documents,
this glaring and obvious clue to their fraudulent creation was steadfastly ignored by Rather and CBS. Having now had their
alleged "proof" exposed for being as phony as Dan Rather’s hair color, Rather and company are now insisting that the
fraudulent documents represented "the essential truth" and were therefore valid in their own way.
So in liberal double-think we now have a new concept in journalism that goes like this: You can use fake documents
to prove your point and once you’ve done that it doesn’t matter if the documents themselves are proven to be fake
because you’ve already established what can reasonably be assumed to be the truth based upon those documents you used
before anyone knew they were fake. During the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler the concept of the Big Lie was perfected by Propaganda
Minister Josef Goebles. Hitler and Goebles had discovered that if you just made a lie BIG enough and repeated it OFTEN enough
that eventually everyone would accept it as being true. As such, they were the philosophical forefathers of modern liberalism,
and of course, of Dan Rather as well.
Next
|
